Patentability Evaluation

Patentability is an opinion on whether a patent application, representing an invention, shows the invention to be entitled by law to be protected by the issuance of a patent. Different countries have different patent laws and patents are territorial, meaning to achieve patent protection in a country, a patent must be issued in that country.


The opinions and skills of a hypothetical person, ‘a person of ordinary skill in the art’ (POSITA), ‘one of ordinary skill in the art’, ‘anyone skilled in the art’ or ‘one skilled in the art’ is one of the benchmarks against which patentability is measured in the U.S. and through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) .

This hypothetical person has been around for a long time, the original and first revision of the USPTO Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) speaks of a method being obvious and unpatentable if “[A]nyone skilled in the art would at once be aware be aware of a method of making it.” See Revision 1 MPEP (1949) 706.03(q) Obvious Method. “Things believed to be known to those skilled in the art are often asserted by the examiner to be “well known” or “matters of common knowledge.””See Revision 1 MPEP (1949) 706.02(a) Establishing “Well Known” Prior Art.


Current revisions of the MPEP (August 2012) refer to a “person of ordinary skill in the art” (often referred to as a POSITA) at least 37 times. “One of ordinary skill in the art”  is referred to at least 58 times,  and “one skilled in the art”  at least 50 times. One of the first references in the current MPEP is regarding the requirement of an enabling disclosure of a provisional patent application “to permit one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the claimed invention in the later filed nonprovisional application without undue experimentation.” MPEP 201.11.


The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) uses a similar objective in Article 33: “[A] claimed invention shall be considered to involve an inventive step if, having regard to the prior art as defined in the Regulations, it is not, at the prescribed relevant date, obvious to a person skilled in the art.”


Patentability & Strategy

Patentability is a complicated concept with a crucial time factor. The subject matter is covered at length in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 2100. One criteria of patentability, obviousness, is examined backwards in time to just before an invention was conceived to determine whether the invention as a whole would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skills in the art (POSITA) (MPEP 2142). The earlier that an invention priority date is established by filing a patent application, the earlier the date where patentability is measured giving an advantage for the applicant against later prior art.


Because of the critical timing of patentability, provisional patent applications can be part of a strategy to establish patentability as soon as possible and as inexpensively as possible to achieve an earlier patentability priority date than a more expensive and later filed nonprovisional patent application. The provisional patent application filing date establishes a priority date ONLY if it supports and is followed by a nonprovisional patent application but the clock does NOT start on the nonprovisional patent term of 20 years until that patent is filed (must be filed within 12 months of earliest provisional patent application to which it claims priority).

With a PCT filing, several provisional patent applications can be used to support one invention under the unity of invention. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) Magazine reports “[I]t is a popular strategy to file a series of related provisional patent applications after each significant technical or commercial milestone in product development, and to file a formal patent application that incorporates them all, within one year of filing the first provisional patent application.”

Many WIPO publications discuss worldwide patenting strategies including using U.S. Provisional Patent Applications, other short-term petty patents, innovation patents or utility models and their growing use. The index to the WIPO web site is at: http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.en.


A Not Just Patents ® Patent Search, Provisional Patent Application, Nonprovisional Patent Application or PCT Patent Application is done by a USPTO registered and licensed patent attorney in the U.S. We will try to match or beat any competitive bid from any other Intellectual Property law firm and we will provide you with better service. See What to Expect from a Not Just Patents Patent Attorney. Call us to discuss patenting and intellectual property strategies.


Not Just Patents ® Legal Services provide a broad range of services for Intellectual Property Protection.

Call us with questions at 1-651-500-7590. Don’t assume that protecting your legal rights is too expensive if you haven’t even called to see what it would cost. We often hear–”I wish I would have called you sooner.”  With business being tough, maker wise decisions may be more important than ever and investing in intellectual property may be a very wise choice.



Call 1-651-500-7590 or email info@notjustpatents.com or ContactTrademark.com for Responses to Office Actions; File or Defend an Opposition or Cancellation; Patent or Trademark Searches and Applications; Send or Respond to Cease and Desist Letters.

For more information from Not Just Patents, see our other sites:      

Patents

Trademarks

Steps to a Patent    How to Patent An Invention

Patent Search Steps

Trademark e Search    Strong Trademark     Enforcing Trade Names

Common Law Trademarks  Trademark Goodwill  Abandoned Trademarks

Should I Get A Trademark or Patent?

Patentability Evaluation

Trademark Disclaimers   Trademark Dilution     Oppose or Cancel?

Examples of Disclaimers  Business Name Cease and Desist

35 U.S.C. 101 Inventions patentable.

Verify a Trademark  Be First To File   How to Trademark Search

35 U.S.C. 102 Conditions for patentability; novelty and loss of right to patent.

Using Slogans (Taglines), Model Numbers as Trademarks

Which format? When Should I  Use Standard Characters?

35 U.S.C. 103 Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter.

Trademark Statistics    Business Name Cease and Desist Letters

How To Answer A Trademark Cease and Desist Letter

35 U.S.C. 282 Presumption of validity; defenses

Trademark Refusals    Does not Function as a Mark Refusals

37 CFR § 1.53 Application number, filing date, and completion of application

Acceptable Specimen       Supplemental Register  $199 Statement of Use

How To Show Acquired Distinctiveness Under 2(f)

Filing Requirements for Patent Applications

Trademark Attorney for Overcoming Office Actions

Functional Trademarks   How to Trademark     Surname Refusal

List of U.S. Patent Classifications

Grounds for Opposition & Cancellation     Cease and Desist Letter

How Do U.S. Patent Classifications Work?

Valid/Invalid Use of Trademarks     Trademark Searching

Patent Statistics     Sample Patent, Trademark & Copyright Inventory Forms

Examples and General Rules for Likelihood of Confusion

USPTO Search Method for Likelihood of Confusion

Examples of Refusals for Likelihood of Confusion  DuPont Factors

Proximate Function

Color as Trade Dress  3D Marks as Trade Dress

Invention Information-  What is the Invention?

Ornamental Refusal  Standard TTAB Protective Order

Patent Field of Search

Descriptive Trademarks Trademark2e.com  Likelihood of Confusion 2d

Patent search-New invention

Merely Descriptive Trademarks   Merely Descriptive Refusals

Patent Search-Non-Obvious

Register a Trademark-Step by Step   Trademark Fixer

Difference between Provisional and Nonprovisional Patent Application

Likelihood of confusion-Circuit Court tests

Pseudo Marks    How to Reply to Cease and Desist Letter

Converting Provisional to Nonprovisional Patent Application (or claiming benefit of)

Overcome Merely Descriptive Refusal   Overcome Likelihood Confusion

What Does ‘Use in Commerce’ Mean?    SCAM Letters

Shop Rights

Section 2(d) Refusals   ApplyToTrademark.com

Patent Pending see also Patent Marking

Typical Brand Name Refusals  What is a Family of Marks?

Patent Drawings

Trademark Steps Trademark Registration Answers TESS  

Trademark Searching Using TESS  Trademark Search Tips

TSDR Trademark Status and Document Retrieval

What is a Small or Micro Entity?

Published for Opposition see also Opposition Steps/Cancellation Steps

Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses

How to Respond to Office Actions

What is a Compact Patent Prosecution?

Protecting Trademark Rights (Common Law)

Steps in a Trademark Opposition Process   How do I Know If Someone Has Filed for An Extension of Time to Oppose?

Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the America Invents Act

What is the Difference between Principal & Supplemental Register? What If Someone Files An Opposition Against My Trademark?

Patent steps

How to Respond Office Actions  DIY Overcoming Descriptive Refusals

PCT Patent Application information

Trademark Clearance Search   DIY Trademark Strategies

Provisional Patent Effect on Patentability

Samples of Responses to Office Actions

ID of Goods and Services see also Headings (list) of International Trademark Classes

Broad Patents

Geographically Descriptive or Deceptive

Making Amendments in Response to Office Actions

TTAB/TBMP Discovery Conferences & Stipulations

TBMP 113 Service of TTAB Documents  TBMP 309 Standing

Examples Office Action Responses More Examples

Trademark Incontestability  TTAB Manual (TBMP)

Trade Secrets

What are Dead or Abandoned Trademarks? Can I Use An Abandoned Trademark?  Can I Abandon a Trademark During An Opposition?

State & Federal Trade Secret Laws

Differences between TEAS and TEAS plus  Zombie Trademark

Chart of Patent vs. Trade Secret

What Does Published for Opposition Mean?

How to Keep A Trade Secret

Acquired Distinctiveness  2(f) or 2(f) in part Extension of Time to Oppose

©2008-2014 All Rights Reserved. Not Just Patents LLC, PO Box 18716, Minneapolis, MN 55418.

Call: 1-651-500-7590 or email: info@notjustpatents.com. This site is for informational purposes only and is provided without warranties, express or implied, regarding the information's accuracy, timeliness, or completeness and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney/client relationship exists without a written contract between Not Just Patents LLC and its client. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Privacy Policy Contact Us See us at NotJustPatents.com

Not Just Patents® LLC

PO Box 18716, Minneapolis, MN 55418  

1-651-500-7590    

info@notjustpatents.com


Aim Higher®

Facts Matter

Search Not Just Patents® sites:


Nonprovisional.com

Tie It Up

Securing the Right IP